Job Amupanda, leader of Affirmative Repositioning, filed a legal case challenging the constitutionality of Namibia’s veterinary cordon fence, widely known as the “redline.” This fence, established during colonial times in 1896, spans over 1,200 kilometers and is designed to control the spread of animal diseases, such as foot-and-mouth disease, by restricting the movement of livestock, meat, milk, and animal products from northern Namibia to the southern regions.
The issue arose after Amupanda had meat worth N$1,000 confiscated by officials from the Ministry of Agriculture at the Oshivelo checkpoint. The meat was destroyed on-site while he was traveling to Windhoek. Amupanda argued that this practice violates human dignity and is unconstitutional, claiming that the redline continues to enforce discriminatory practices rooted in Namibia’s colonial past. He believes the fence restricts not only the movement of goods but also perpetuates economic inequality between the north and south.
The Ministry of Agriculture, on the other hand, defends the redline as essential for safeguarding Namibia’s livestock industry and meat exports. According to their argument, removing the fence would expose the southern regions to diseases prevalent in the north, which could jeopardize jobs and economic stability. Reports suggest that over 33,000 permanent jobs could be at risk if the redline were abolished.
During court proceedings, the government’s legal representative dismissed Amupanda’s claims, describing them as politically motivated rather than a genuine legal challenge. However, Amupanda insists that the case is a matter of justice and equality, emphasizing that the redline perpetuates historical injustices and affects the livelihoods of families in the north.
This case, being heard in the Windhoek High Court, has attracted national attention. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for Namibia’s agricultural policies, economic landscape, and efforts to address historical inequalities. Amupanda is represented by advocate Mbushandje Ntinda, with the case highlighting the tension between maintaining public health and addressing socio-economic disparities.
